Questions with (Answers) to value investors updated*
Some possible answers are (subjective to ones opinons and own thinking if it's ture of false)
My answer to all the questions would be :-
1) to select fundamentally sound companies and use trend lines to determine when to get in and when to get out.
2) you will miss a lot of high flyers but you will also avoid permanent capital impairment due to financially unsound companies being suspended or forever becoming penny stocks.
-by focus1974
__________________________________________________
1) I will sell if the fundamentals of the company has changed or the stock is overvalued. If the stock price has fallen though the fundamentals are still sound, I will buy more. Patience is the key here.
2) I will not jump in and buy straightaway. You have to decide which plan are you going to follow i.e. investing or trading or a combination of both or buy on news ?How about I rephrase your question in another way. Will you feel lucky and good, should the share price drop but you didn't buy because you didn't study proper the fundamental ?
3) Fundamentals don't change overnight. It is better to sell if the fundamentals have changed. You can't predict what will happen in the future but you can control what you wish to do presently.
4) I don't exactly use a discount rate. I define it as my required rate of return. If I want my counter to return 20% annually, I will use this number as my discount rate and put into the model to see what price should I buy. I would prefer to use P/E personally.
5) You can compare it with the leading companies regarding these financial ratios and numbers.
-by moneytalk.sg his blog is at http://www.moneytalk.sg/
__________________________________________
Relating to 1, 4 amd 5
I guess:"But having a margin of safety will make very sure that you will not lose your shirt. Even if you are damn wrong on your intrinsic value, you may lose a bit of money, the stock may tank 20%, below your buying price but quite unlikely to tank 80% below your buying price. And chances are after it tanked it will creep back up again, it will not bankrupt you. That's the strength if you have a huge margin of safety."
-by whatdoing367, his blog http://8percentpa.blogspot.com/2009/
___________________________________________
Just trying to answer some of the questions
1) on fundamental grounds, you dont sell because of some stop loss price you set. you sell, if the outlook changes. in fact, you should be buying more because it is cheaper now. or stop buying more if you already have a substantial holding in the same stock. diversification still plays an important part
5) the absolute number in % does not mean anything. you need to compare among companies in the same industry
-by MikeDirnt78 his blog http://sti-stocksinfo.blogspot.com
__________________________________________
1)I do not practise the cut loss strategy. however, i will sell if the fundamental that i buy into is beginning to fade. fundamental can mean different things to different ppl. for me, the business landscape of the sector that the company is in must have existing potential (theres alot to be elaborated on this but juz imagine selling steam locomotive today in singapore).the board should be reliable in making their statements. you can check this by referring to previous annual reports and see if they meet the KPI they set. i think it is quite fool proof that if insiders are buying or theres a buyback by the company, its a strong buy signal to average down ur existing holdingsometimes, id just leave a small holding to remind myself of my folly
2)I will not jump in. i do not have sufficient confidence and knowledge to handle speculation. lol without enough knowledge, i am only increasing my risk for speculating the same stock with someone who knows what he is doing. anyway, if someone is very good in trading, i think hes probably earning more trading derivatives with all the leverage
3)Yeah, like what the other poster has said. fundamentals do not change that quickly unless you can somehow change the board of directors and kicks the founder or ceo out overnitebut yeah, if wat u believe in no longer exists... sell
4)I do not think warren buffett's method is very applicable to me. so gotta be selective to pick from this techniquelike u said, sometimes it can get very operational and he absolutely has no prob knowing those infohe buys companies in double digit % holding and able to get 10% P.shares from GM i think!theres no way retail investor like me can do thati prefer phillips fisher style of valuation.
5)Yeah, financial ratios are sector specific, you can use industry avg or leading firms' ratiobut nowadays... its harder to determine nowtoo many companies are in many different sectors, its almost impossible to have a good gauge.unless u really dig for info and find out the revenue/cost distribution and break down into ratios againfor example, msft.... how much of their revenue are in serverware, services, entertainment, database software, desktop software, etc ??if u want to compare it with oracle or EA or ibm.... how can it be accurate when the revenue composition in all these companies are different ?if revenue composition cannot be determined, how is it possible to determine a fair profit margin at corporate level ? lol maybe product level margin is easier.as long as we are comparing orange to durian, we are nt goin to get accurate ratios or numbers imopaisae for the unstructural answers lol but i tink the qns are worth answering
-By Jarlaxle
Post a Comment